Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÄÚ¾î Àç·á¿¡ µû¸¥ ºñ´Ï¾î¸µ µµÀçÀÇ Àü´Ü°áÇÕ°­µµ ºñ±³

Shear Bond Strength of Veneering Ceramics to Different Core Materials

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úÀç·áÇÐȸÁö 2016³â 43±Ç 2È£ p.121 ~ 129
¾ç¼±Èñ, ·ùÅÂÈÆ, ±èÁ¤¹Ì, ±èÀ¯¸®,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¾ç¼±Èñ ( Yang Sun-Hee ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
·ùÅÂÈÆ ( Ryu Tae-Hun ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
±èÁ¤¹Ì ( Kim Jeong-Mi ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°úº´¿ø Ä¡°ú±â°ø½Ç
±èÀ¯¸® ( Kim Yu-Lee ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract


This study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of veneering ceramics to the casting Co-Cr alloy core, milling Co-Cr alloy core, and milling zirconia core. Three kinds of core system (StarLoy C for casting, Sintron for milling, and zirconia for milling) were used to prepare ceramic core-porcelain veneer. The specimen of main model core was made according to Schmitz-Schulmeyer method and 15 specimens were produced in each group. Duceram Kiss (DeguDent, Germany) was used as veneering ceramic in Co-Cr alloy and IPS e.max Ceram (Ivoclar, Lichtenstein) was used for zirconia. Shear bond strength was measured at a crosshead speed of 0.5 §®/min by using the universal testing machine (Z020, Zwick, Ulm, Germany). Fracture pattern was observed in the magnifying power of 15 by using a scanning electron microscope. Shear bond strength was analyzed in one-way ANOVA by using SPSS Ver. 12.0 (SPSS GmbH, Munich, Germany), and post test was performed in Duncan¡¯s multiple range test(¥á = 0.05)
The means shear-bond strength of Sintron group(28.26¡¾3.29) was significantly better than those of StarLoy C group(25.31¡¾3.33) and Ceramill Zirconia group(23.79¡¾43.39)(p£¾0.05). But a significant difference was not found between StarLoy C group and Ceramill Zirconia group. In terms of failure mode of specimens, all experimental groups showed combined failure mode including adhesive and cohesive failure.

Å°¿öµå

Shear bond strength; Casting Co-Cr alloy; Milling Co-Cr alloy; Milling zirconia; Failure mode

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI